The thing that's been completely left out of the Dick Cheney "how dare anyone dither when it comes to blowing up our enemies and rewarding our torturers" speech is the context in which that speech was given.
The Villagers don't like to talk about specifics when it comes to the beltway dinner circuit at which so many of them feed.
This dinner, minimum $500.00 a plate, was to given by the self-described, and I am not making this up, "non-partisan organization" The Center for Security Policy. Dick Cheney was speaking at their 20th anniversary dinner, at which he received the, hold back your breakfast now, "Keeper of the Flame" award. Cheney was introduced by, among others, Don Rumsfeld, a former awardee himself. You know who else has this prize sitting on a shelf in their well-appointed Georgetown dens?
Joe Lieberman
Duncan Hunter
James Inhofe
Paul Wolfowitz
Newt Gingrich
Ronald Reagan
Jon Kyl
Caspar Weinberger
Okay, then. So why would anyone not expect a bowl full of neocon crazy in his acceptance speech? He's among friends.
Why can't the press be honest? And how, at this point in history, has that become a completely rhetorical question?
crossposted from Blue Gal
