We have been informed by the whistleblower’s counsel that their client would like to speak to our committee and has requested guidance from the Acting DNI as to how to do so.

We‘re in touch with counsel and look forward to the whistleblower’s testimony as soon as this week.

— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) September 24, 2019

The whistleblower report is said to involve a number of things; this phone call is one but not all. https://t.co/5jeRJScYWB

— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) September 24, 2019

It's the whistleblower complaint that matters. This is nothing but a down payment on that, and it has all the feel of the Barr summary that preceded the Mueller report. https://t.co/WunXEw5wHg

— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) September 24, 2019

Even if Trump releases the full transcript, it has been reported by multiple outlets that the whistleblower complaint involved multiple actions. It's not just about the call between Trump and Zelensky.

— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) September 24, 2019

This is huge.

The whistleblower on Trump's bribe offer to Ukraine wants to speak on the record to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.

Buckle up.https://t.co/BvhRSCqf0P

— Mikel Jollett (@Mikel_Jollett) September 24, 2019

If the White House is fine with releasing the transcript of a call, what’s the issue with releasing a whistleblower’s complaint to Congress? If everything was above board, it would seem transparency would help clear things up.

— Josh Campbell (@joshscampbell) September 24, 2019