Deborah Howell still has no clue as she channels Malkin: "the narrow liberal-blogger definition of whether any Democrats took money 'from Abramoff'
January 21, 2006

Deborah Howell still has no clue as she channels Malkin:

"the narrow liberal-blogger definition of whether any Democrats took money 'from Abramoff' -- which neatly excludes contributions he directed his clients to make -- amounts to foolish semantics.''

To be nice about it Debbie, we cherish the news and need you to report the facts properly. A lot depends on it. We have a country divided and the republicans have been running a corrupt campaign against us. Please try to be a little more careful next time.

"To all of those who wanted me fired, I'm afraid you're out of luck. I have a contract. For the next two years, I will continue to speak my mind."

As my friend Steve says regarding this statement:

"the comments wouldn't even merit a notice on most blogs, much less Slashdot"

As you will learn on the "internets" Debbie, those kind of requests (wishing you were fired) are common, however some on the right wing actually revel in getting reporters fired. Now please go back to being an Ombudsman and we'll all get along.

Can you help us out?

For nearly 20 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

Discussion

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.
Mastodon